Like hello, perhaps if she got off her back for long enough, her consort could get off her front and start looking for a job to look after the progeny properly
It might help to know how long she's been on the DPB. Or are we not not allowed to know for "privacy reasons"? A woman whose husband just recently dumped her and the kids for the office girl has more sympathy than some slut who's been a baby factory since puberty.
I See Red, it won't help and it is irrelevant. We are talking about a woman who moans about the cost of living and the amount of taxpayer largesse at her disposal but who continues to make her predictament, and that of her children, worse by either not closing her legs or going on the pill. End of.
BTW John Key is not to blame for Joan Nathan's predictament. Joan Nathan is the cause of all her problems. Irresponsible woman who is obviously only too willing to be serviced without contraception when she can ill afford to bring more children into this world for oh so many reasons.
The use of the term "father" implies a connection in some way to the well being of his child. I have that connection with my step children whom are my responsibility to care for just as my own children are.
Precisely; and they're neccessary to keep the wheels of welfare turning - just so long they don't do it int he street and distrub the horses. The hypocrisy, from top to bottom, is so profound as to be psychotic.
Anon, re the term breeder being used as a derogatory word, no I didn't know that. How interesting.
I've always found the use of the word terrible. It reflects the mindset of people who would treat people like animals.
All of this talk about contraception and sterilisation is more animal talk. The woman is a human being. Why not expect her to not have sex? Why not insist on no more DPB, because there is never any attempt on her part to get into a stable relationship via a formal commitment?
I know why, because talk of this sort leads to no sex before marriage talk, and that sort of talk is not a direction many men in this country want to head in.
18 comments:
Its always someone else's fault.
Stop breeding and get some contraception - you irresponsible bitch.
Like hello, perhaps if she got off her back for long enough, her consort could get off her front and start looking for a job to look after the progeny properly
Agree with that.
Should have been steralised after the first kid
lastmanstanding
Welcome to the NZ our vacuous PM seems content to maintain.
It is all god's fault for playground next toa sewer.
It might help to know how long she's been on the DPB. Or are we not not allowed to know for "privacy reasons"? A woman whose husband just recently dumped her and the kids for the office girl has more sympathy than some slut who's been a baby factory since puberty.
I See Red, it won't help and it is irrelevant. We are talking about a woman who moans about the cost of living and the amount of taxpayer largesse at her disposal but who continues to make her predictament, and that of her children, worse by either not closing her legs or going on the pill. End of.
Anon @ 6.16pm
BTW John Key is not to blame for Joan Nathan's predictament. Joan Nathan is the cause of all her problems. Irresponsible woman who is obviously only too willing to be serviced without contraception when she can ill afford to bring more children into this world for oh so many reasons.
It seems that the lower the IQ the more fertile these sponging baby factories are!
Cadwallader
You do realise the word 'breeder' is used by homosexuals as derogatory term for heterosexuals?
The MSM never mentions the father/s in these "feelgood" stories.
The use of the term "father" implies a connection in some way to the well being of his child. I have that connection with my step children whom are my responsibility to care for just as my own children are.
These are not fathers, they are sperm donors.
Precisely; and they're neccessary to keep the wheels of welfare turning - just so long they don't do it int he street and distrub the horses. The hypocrisy, from top to bottom, is so profound as to be psychotic.
Anon, re the term breeder being used as a derogatory word, no I didn't know that. How interesting.
I've always found the use of the word terrible. It reflects the mindset of people who would treat people like animals.
All of this talk about contraception and sterilisation is more animal talk. The woman is a human being. Why not expect her to not have sex? Why not insist on no more DPB, because there is never any attempt on her part to get into a stable relationship via a formal commitment?
I know why, because talk of this sort leads to no sex before marriage talk, and that sort of talk is not a direction many men in this country want to head in.
...not a direction many men...
Drive down Manchester St in Christchurch. Its the women selling (which doesn't excuse the men).
Go to a large public function and look at how young women dress and drink (which doesn't excuse the men).
The moral decline is now as much about women behaving badly as men. It may have always been that way but if so it wasn't so obvious.
Lucia said...
Why not expect her to not have sex?
A vibrator is her best option and its cheap. Still get the multiple orgasms plus no babies to burden her as a result.
Post a Comment